- Plasma is more similar to Windows
- Plasma is more customizable
- Plasma is just as beginner-friendly
- Plasma has more features
- Plasma is more actively developed
- Plasma looks better
Don’t get me wrong, Cinnamon is fine, but it gets recommended religiously to beginners for some reason. It just doesn’t make sense, so I will keep repeating this, not least to keep alive the ancient linux tradition of Desktop wars.
Still, any Windows to Linux transition is a step forward and I support this, upvoted.
- Plasma is wayy more buggy in cinnamon (Alteast my experience)
Plasma and Cinnamon are two different Desktops, one can’t be in the other :) Did you mean Plasma on Mint?
No Plasma on Kubuntu,KDE neon,etc
ah, I think you meant “than”. Fair enough, my recent experience has been super smooth
As someone who has extensively used both Cinnamon and Plasma: I find Plasma a lot less polished, by a huge margin. Not only do settings have unusual defaults and are located in places you wouldn’t expect, it also often has desktop-breaking bugs out of nowhere even in stable versions, and this has only gotten worse with Wayland. Even as someone who has been using Arch for years now, I still struggle with getting Plasma to not shit itself every once in a while.
Cinnamon on the other hand does have a lot less features out of the box, but the few things it does, it does them well, and every setting is where a sane person would search for them.
I would not recommend Plasma to a Linux beginner at all. It’s the kind of unpolished mess that would make anyone who doesn’t care enough about computers to just give up and go back to Windows.
Hm thanks for sharing your experience, it’s very different from mine though. Have you used Plasma recently (Version 6+) ? And have you used it on a distro where it came pre-packaged? In my (limited) experience any DE installed on Arch is janky out of the box.
I am running Plasma 6.2.1 as we speak. Admittedly, yes, using Arch has certainly made it less stable. But more often than not, when I search the web for some strange behavior/bug/limitation in my desktop, I often find dozens of threads with lots of people reporting the same misbehavior or limitation from all over the distro space, and I have come to the conclussion that it’s not entirely Arch’s fault at that point.
Have you done literally any customization to panels? I swear that shit keeps crashing whenever I do so much as unpinning a simple app launcher plasmoid, and even if it didn’t crash, it still takes patience to navigate through all the menus. They completely overhauled the way panel settings look and behave, and I still find the experience annoying as hell. In contrast, customizing panels is pretty straightforward in Cinnamon, and works as expected. It merely doesn’t look as good.
I don’t hate Plasma, or else I would have switched to another DE by now, but this is mostly because I have learned to tame it, and that took a lot of effort that no beginner should have to go through. Cinnamon is like, the polar opposite of that, which is why I’m okay with it being religiously recommended to beginners.
KDE’s priorities are just kinda weird. I have the similar issues with Krita, an otherwise excellent drawing program.
- Plasma is more resource intensive, and this meme is specifically about machines that are 7-10 years out of date
Plasma is more resource intensive,
maybe back during the plasma 4 days, this meme needs to go away
Hmm TDE is not resource intensive?
That’s a good point!
I’d say kde plasma is closest to windows 10 while Linux mints cinnamon covers vista, 7, 8.1 and 11
For me kde is closer to windows 8.1 10 and 11
i fully disagree with windows 11 with every part of my being(i came from 11)
The Taskbar atleast
